Online Mechanical Engineering Bachelor DegreeThe different kinds of photography apprenticeships
Sign in | Register  AD: Prague Real Estate: Are you looking for a flat in Prague? Check our real estate section...
Prague TV DirectoryArticlesZine › Life After Havel

Life After Havel

In the race to replace the Velvet President, an appropriate touch of the absurd.

Life After Havel
By Marek Tomin
Tue 14th Jan, 2003 [updated Thu 6th Oct, 2005]
Add to favorites email print this article Share on FaceBoook

On January 15, as Václav Havel’s third and last presidential term draws to a close, Czech MPs will kick off the first of what may be many rounds of a political ball game to determine the next Czech president.

There are now four official candidates for the first stage of the process, with several other potential contenders hanging out on the sidelines, all expressing a willingness to join the race at a later stage. Apart from one woman who hasn’t yet confirmed her candidacy, the actors – in what will probably turn out to be a Havel-style absurd drama with a touch of slapstick comedy – are all men.

Warning signs point to trouble. Too much political deadlock in the wake of Havel’s departure may ultimately necessitate a change in the electoral system as well as extend the playwright-president’s influence on presidential politics after he leaves office. The upcoming ballot is an important moment. It promises not only to place the Czech system of presidential elections under a harsh light, but it will also test the internal unity of the governing political parties and their fragile alliance.

The fact that it will not be the people of the country themselves who decide on Havel’s successor hasn’t stopped media agencies from carrying out opinion polls. In the latest survey by SC&C, Václav Klaus of the Civic Democrats (ODS) is well ahead with 32.5%, followed by the Christian Democrat (KDU-ÈSL) candidate Petr Pithart with 23.3% and the Social Democrats’ Jaroslav Bure with 13%. The Communist Party runner, Miroslav Køí?eneck´´, has consistently come in last, this time with 8.1%.

In the peculiar Czech electoral system, separate ballots will be held in each of the two houses of Parliament. In order to be elected outright in the first round, a candidate would have to get a majority in both the Lower House (101 votes) and the Senate (41 votes). The only candidate likely to come out at least partially victorious in the first round is former dissident and post-89 premier of the Czechoslovak Federal Republic, Petr Pithart. But he is only likely to succeed in the Senate where his own party, KDU-ÈSL, and its coalition partner US-DEU, hold an unassailable position. The expected result in the Lower House is much less clear and the vote may end with an outright fiasco. If no one achieves an overall majority, the date will be set for another round of the ballot. The entire process will then start from scratch.

Though it would seem logical that the two contenders with most votes overall should go head-to-head in the second round, this is not necessarily the case. In fact, new candidates may then be brought forward. Individual political parties might call on their own new candidates, as may be the case with Milo Zeman, or temporary and rather loose political alliances may be brokered, which may happen with the ombudsman Otakar Motejl.

The run up to the ballot has already stirred up muddy political waters, and much mudslinging lies ahead.

The Social Democrats have been worst hit by pre-election wrangles, which threaten to send the party into disarray. Most notably, the run-up to the ballot has exposed major differences between former premier Milo Zeman and the current premier Vladimír pidla. This despite the fact that it was pidla who asked Zeman to stand for president in the first place. pidla then apparently got cold feet about Zeman’s candidacy and came up with the idea of holding a party referendum, which would also be open to the public, to select ÈSSD’s presidential candidate. Although Zeman was triumphant, gaining almost half of the votes cast, with Bure coming in second and Motejl third, he then cast doubt on the entire exercise by refusing to stand in the first round. The party’s Central Executive Committee thus had no choice but to choose Jaroslav Bure as the official candidate.

pidla has been more and more open about his opposition to Zeman’s candidacy, recently calling him “a politician of the past.” Although he later denied the claim, at a meeting of Social Democrat MPs, pidla is reputed to have said: “Surely we’ll not let Zeman’s bastards subvert the party.”

Of course, all this may just amount to some bizarre political trickery that is part of a sophisticated Social Democratic strategy. More likely, though, it’s just the opening act of a hitherto unrivalled political farce. It now turns out that pidla is not happy with Bure, either.

Initially, Otakar Motejl was seen as one of the strongest contenders. A professional lawyer, he became the presiding judge of the High Court in Prague in 1968, but left the office in 1970, following the events of the Prague Spring. Until 1990 he worked as a solicitor, gaining significant moral credit by acting as defence lawyer for a number of dissidents, unofficial culture figures and independent activists. After 1989 he became the presiding judge of the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic and for two years he was Czech Justice Minister. Significantly, he is also seen as one of the least politically motivated potential candidates and in this respect is closest to Havel’s supreme apoliticism. At one point in November, Motejl led in the opinion polls with an astounding 81%.

After a series of political mishaps that have seen his popularity plunge, he is now being rather more guarded about his possible candidature, saying only that he will consider standing if called on by a broad spectrum of political parties. The most serious blow to Motejl’s chances was his own admission that twenty years ago he had been involved in a serious car accident that resulted in the death of one person. In an interview for Lidové Noviny, Milo Zeman showed no remorse: “I must say that if – like Otakar Motejl – I had in the past killed someone in a car accident, I certainly wouldn’t have the courage to run for president.”

So far, politicians, the media and the candidates themselves have devoted more time to political sleaze than to the strategies and policies that should be pursued by the presidential office. This is not such a surprise. After all, Havel’s apparently spotless moral standing has been one of his greatest assets.

The only candidate that comes anywhere near Havel in this respect is his fellow former dissident and Charter 77 signatory Petr Pithart. But even his past is far from unblemished. To begin with, in the ’60s he was a member of the Communist Party, although he was expelled at the beginning of the post-68 era of normalization and became a prominent dissident.

Much less impressive was Pithart’s political career after the Velvet Revolution of 1989. During his two-year spell as the Prime Minister of the Czechoslovak Federal Republic, his inability to make resolute decisions proved to be disastrous and almost killed his political career. He finally found his niche as leader of the Senate, a position that doesn’t require much decisiveness.

If Pithart’s moral credentials don’t match those of Václav Havel, those of the ÈSSD candidate Bure are for many an outright disgrace. Not only was Bure a prominent judge under communism, between 1986 and 1989 he was a member of the Communist Party. “My idea that by joining the Communist Party in 1986 I will have greater opportunity to push through better conditions for the execution of justice and my own involvement turned out to be wrong,” Bure notes on his pre-election web site. In an effort to drum up as much moral credit as possible, Bure has recently made a major blunder. He told MF DNES that twenty years ago as a judge he helped a Charter 77 signatory. Subsequently it turned out that the man was not a dissident, but a long-time member of the Communist Party.

Bure may well turn out to be a sacrificial lamb. He is likely to get enough of the votes to ensure that neither Klaus nor anyone else can win the contest outright in the first round. After this he will have served his purpose and heavyweight Zeman can take over.

Besides his moral authority, Havel’s greatest strength is his international reputation. For many, Havel is the man who brought a new moral and intellectual dimension to international politics. Not even his most staunch domestic opponents can deny the enormous amount of work that he has done on behalf of the Czech Republic abroad, and the current candidates are well aware of this.

In a rather calm confrontation with Bure on Prima TV, Pithart said that “the main task of the president should be to work towards boosting national self-confidence.” Both men stressed that the president should spend a lot of time at home with his own people. According to Pithart, “the president should travel around the republic a great deal.” By trying to be different from Havel, both have ignored one of the key roles of the Czech president in what is fundamentally a parliamentary system – that of the country’s supreme international ambassador.

Of the first round candidates, the only person with diplomatic experience comparable to Havel’s is his long-term adversary Václav Klaus. Though well known in the international domain, he is not exactly the world’s darling, though he did become Margaret Thatcher’s little plaything (she was on her way into retirement by then, however). During his long reign as Czech Prime Minister, the liberal economy ideologue became infamous for his scathing and arrogant comments concerning the European Union, for example. German Chance-llor Helmut Kohl had an antipathy towards him that bordered on aversion, though apparently Klaus did not reciprocate this.

If Klaus has at times lacked diplomatic sensitivity, Milo Zeman, the man who replaced him as premier, has been a walking disaster zone. On an official state visit to Israel last year, he gave a landmine of an interview to a major newspaper. Zeman compared the Palestinians to the Sudeten Germans at the end of World War II, essentially suggesting that the Palestinians should share their fate (in a period of Czech history most would like to forget, the Sudeten Germans were driven out of Czechoslovakia with more than just reasonable force). When asked whether he means to compare Arafat with Hitler, he replied: “Of course.” He went on to say: “It is not my task to evaluate Arafat, but whoever supports terrorism...is in my eyes a terrorist.” Zeman said later that his words had been misconstrued, possibly because a full stop had been made after the words “of course.”

It was not the first of Zeman’s diplomatic howlers. He once used the word “idiots” in connection with Austrians voting against the completion of the Temelín nuclear power plant. From a PR point of view, the prospect of Zeman at the helm of the Castle is a frightening one indeed.

Probably the most controversial subject during Havel’s time in office has been the granting of presidential pardons. Though many of his pardons have made good sense, in the recent pre-Christmas batch Havel suspended the prison sentences of two drunk-drivers and a policeman who embezzled money from a pensioner. Bure has given assurances that he “would not give any pardons without consulting the Minister of Justice.” He is himself a former Justice Minister. As usual, Pithart has been ambiguous on the subject, saying: “it’s hard to say in advance what changes could be made.” Klaus told Lidové Noviny that he considers it “necessary to limit the number of pardons granted through a change of legislation and a change in the behaviour of the president.”

The issue of pardons is one that is related to the scope of presidential powers in general. None of the candidates have so far been bold enough to suggest that these should be extended. In an interview for MF DNES, Klaus said: “I state categorically: even though many try to say that I think otherwise, I don’t think that there should be any strengthening of presidential powers. I really am an advocate of the key role of the Prime Minister. In fact I think that in our country the president has more functions and powers than he should in a non-presidential system.” On a more specific note, Bure said that he “would consult with the Government before appointing the Governor General of the Czech National Bank.” Pithart said “consultations should go on until agreement is reached.” In his case, though, it could turn out to be a rather lengthy process.

If a president is not elected by February 3, when Havel’s term in office ends, the presidential powers will be temporarily divided between the Prime Minister and the Chairman of Parliament. MPs will then be under a great deal of pressure to pass and act of Parliament that will change the system to a plebiscite. Over the past thirteen years, Havel has been the only viable presidential candidate. Though some might try to argue to the contrary, most agree that despite some ups and downs in popularity, Havel would have succeeded equally well if put before the people. In a recent survey by TNS Factum, 87% of Czechs asked are currently in favour of a plebiscite, and long-term surveys show that this has been the case for many years.

Given the current political forces in Parliament, the chances that the people’s consistent favorite, Václav Klaus, seen by many as the only person with stature equal to Havel’s, will be elected by parliament are quite slim. A plebiscite, on the other hand, would make him the outright favorite.

In addition, it is becoming quite clear that as time goes on, the kind of post-communist moral authority associated with the persona of Václav Havel will become increasingly rare. More importantly, perhaps, it can no longer be the key criterion for selecting an adequate person to perform the function of president. The times are changing rapidly. In his New Year address to the nation, Havel said the next president should be “wise, frank and responsible.” More recently, at a farewell party for diplomats, he expressed hope that he would be replaced by someone who is “vibrant, younger, more healthy.”

Maybe. But as one Czech commentator put it, the current line-up of candidates suggests that the presidential office will become “a dump for wasted politicians.” And it seems Havel’s exit is setting the scene for an absurd drama starring several ambitious men eager to own that dump.
Article added on Tue 14th Jan, 2003 [last updated Thu 6th Oct, 2005]

Share this page

Add to favorites email print this article Stumble! del.icio.us digg this Share on FaceBoook
COMMENT ON THIS ARTICLE
Your name:
Your email:
Spam prevention - enter the text from this image:
(Tip: Logged in members do not have enter the spam prevention code.)
All comments are welcome, but please note that only those that offer clarification, criticism, corrections, or insight are likely to be published.
READ ALL ZINE ARTICLES MORE ZINE ARTICLES
The Coral - The Best Band You Wished You Knew About by Oliver White
British Rock Group
Added on Tue 14th Dec, 2010 (Last updated Tue 14th Dec, 2010)
US Voter Registration - 2010 Midterm Elections by Julia Bryan
Art Schankler Interview
Added on Thu 7th Oct, 2010 (Last updated Thu 7th Oct, 2010)
Ride Planet Earth's Kim Nguyen in Prague by Irene Carpintero
Epic Bike Ride
Added on Tue 10th Nov, 2009 (Last updated Tue 10th Nov, 2009)
A Counterpoint to the Claim of Apartheid Conditions for Czech Roma by Foreign Religious Leaders by Oliver White
Oliver White responds to Rajan Zed & Rabbi Jonathan B. Freirich's recent press releases urging Pope Benedict XVI to highlight 'Roma apartheid'
Added on Tue 27th Oct, 2009 (Last updated Tue 27th Oct, 2009)
Hindus & Jews Disappointed With Pope for Ignoring Roma Apartheid by Rajan Zed & Rabbi Jonathan B. Freirich
Press Release
Added on Thu 1st Oct, 2009
Hindus & Jews Pinning Hopes on Pope for Highlighting Roma Apartheid in Czech Republic by Rajan Zed & Rabbi Jonathan B. Freirich
Press Release
Added on Tue 22nd Sep, 2009 (Last updated Tue 22nd Sep, 2009)
Provokator Tiki Live Lizard Lounge by Provokator
Provokator Press Release
Added on Fri 18th Sep, 2009
Brunch at Orange Bar by Steve Smith & Damien Mitchell
New Morning Menus at Old Town Hangout
Added on Thu 5th Feb, 2009 (Last updated Mon 16th Feb, 2009)
Steve's Guide to Eating Sushi by Steve Smith
PTV guide to eating Sushi
Added on Wed 4th Feb, 2009 (Last updated Mon 16th Feb, 2009)
Neo-Nazis Emerge From the Shadows by Aisha Gawad
Extremists Seek Exposure
Added on Thu 8th May, 2008 (Last updated Tue 20th May, 2008)
Kosovo - How I See It by Dean Bedford
Backing Independence is a 'Huge Mistake'
Added on Tue 1st Apr, 2008 (Last updated Wed 22nd Oct, 2008)
The Problem With Nazis by Oliver White
Freedom of Expression and the Politics of Hate
Added on Wed 6th Feb, 2008 (Last updated Tue 11th Mar, 2008)
Drunk but Not Delinquent by Katherine Bernard
Czech Teens & Alcohol
Added on Thu 24th Jan, 2008 (Last updated Mon 28th Jan, 2008)
Breaking a Vicious Cycle by Casey Dean
With the Carbusters
Added on Wed 28th Nov, 2007 (Last updated Mon 3rd Dec, 2007)
The Czech Mentality - Part 3 - Other Observations by Ondøej Vykydal
Some Closing Comments
Added on Wed 19th Sep, 2007 (Last updated Tue 9th Oct, 2007)
READ ALL ZINE ARTICLES

GOLD LISTINGS

Galeria HarfaGaleria Harfa
The biggest shopping & administration mall in Prague

Ristorante SoaveRistorante Soave
La cucina italiana

Century 21Century 21
World Leader in Real Estate

Expat Center

Prague TV Home | Contact | About | FAQ | Site Map | Search | Advertise | Privacy | Terms of Service

Prague TV is a Real Time Production. ©2012 All rights reserved.

Prague Directory