Training Bra, Wonder Bra: Women IntimatesMechanical Engineering InformationThe different kinds of photography apprenticeshipsSave on Car InsuranceHome RemodelingKingston MTD Andrew Gouche Signature Bass
Sign in | Register  
Prague TV DirectoryDiscussion Forums

War on Bloggers

Posted by: [ anonymous ] - [anonymous]
Date posted: 2005-03-05 14:05
Tools: Email to a friend Send to a friend
  Report abuse or inappropriate posts Report abuse
Bradley Smith says that the freewheeling days of political blogging and online punditry are over.

In just a few months, he warns, bloggers and news organizations could risk the wrath of the federal government if they improperly link to a campaign's Web site. Even forwarding a political candidate's press release to a mailing list, depending on the details, could be punished by fines.

Smith should know. He's one of the six commissioners at the Federal Election Commission, which is beginning the perilous process of extending a controversial 2002 campaign finance law to the Internet.

In 2002, the FEC exempted the Internet by a 4-2 vote, but U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly last fall overturned that decision. "The commission's exclusion of Internet communications from the coordinated communications regulation severely undermines" the campaign finance law's purposes, Kollar-Kotelly wrote.

Smith and the other two Republican commissioners wanted to appeal the Internet-related sections. But because they couldn't get the three Democrats to go along with them, what Smith describes as a "bizarre" regulatory process now is under way.

CNET News.com spoke with Smith about the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, better known as the McCain-Feingold law, and its forthcoming extrusion onto the Internet.

Q: What rules will apply to the Internet that did not before?
A: The commission has generally been hands-off on the Internet. We've said, "If you advertise on the Internet, that's an expenditure of money--much like if you were advertising on television or the newspaper."

The real question is: Would a link to a candidate's page be a problem? If someone sets up a home page and links to their favorite politician, is that a contribution? This is a big deal, if someone has already contributed the legal maximum, or if they're at the disclosure threshold and additional expenditures have to be disclosed under federal law.

Certainly a lot of bloggers are very much out front. Do we give bloggers the press exemption? If we don't give bloggers the press exemption, we have the question of, do we extend this to online-only journals like CNET?

How can the government place a value on a blog that praises some politician?
How do we measure that? Design fees, that sort of thing? The FEC did an advisory opinion in the late 1990s (in the Leo Smith case) that I don't think we'd hold to today, saying that if you owned a computer, you'd have to calculate what percentage of the computer cost and electricity went to political advocacy.

It seems absurd, but that's what the commission did. And that's the direction Judge Kollar-Kotelly would have us move in. Line drawing is going to be an inherently very difficult task. And then we'll be pushed to go further. Why can this person do it, but not that person?

How about a hyperlink? Is it worth a penny, or a dollar, to a campaign?
I don't know. But I'll tell you this. One thing the commission has argued over, debated, wrestled with, is how to value assistance to a campaign.

Corporations aren't allowed to donate to campaigns. Suppose a corporation devotes 20 minutes of a secretary's time and $30 in postage to sending out letters for an executive. As a result, the campaign raises $35,000. Do we value the violation on the amount of corporate resources actually spent, maybe $40, or the $35,000 actually raised? The commission has usually taken the view that we value it by the amount raised. It's still going to be difficult to value the link, but the value of the link will go up very quickly.

Then what's the real impact of the judge's decision?
The judge's decision is in no way limited to ads. She says that any coordinated activity over the Internet would need to be regulated, as a minimum. The problem with coordinated activity over the Internet is that it will strike, as a minimum, Internet reporting services.

They're exempt from regulation only because of the press exemption. But people have been arguing that the Internet doesn't fit under the press exemption. It becomes a really complex issue that would strike deep into the heart of the Internet and the bloggers who are writing out there today. (Editor's note: federal law limits the press exemption to a "broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine or other periodical publication." )

How do you see this playing out?
There's sensitivity in the commission on this. But remember the commission's decision to exempt the Internet only passed by a 4-2 vote.

This time, we couldn't muster enough votes to appeal the judge's decision. We appealed parts of her decision, but there were only three votes to appeal the Internet part (and we needed four). There seem to be at least three commissioners who like this.

Then this is a partisan issue?
Yes, it is at this time. But I always point out that partisan splits tend to reflect ideology rather than party. I don't think the Democratic commissioners are sitting around saying that the Internet is working to the advantage of the Republicans.

One of the reasons it's a good time to (fix this) now is you don't know who's benefiting. Both the Democrats and Republicans used the Internet very effectively in the last campaign.

What would you like to see happen?
I'd like someone to say that unpaid activity over the Internet is not an expenditure or contribution, or at least activity done by regular Internet journals, to cover sites like CNET, Slate and Salon. Otherwise, it's very likely that the Internet is going to be regulated, and the FEC and Congress will be inundated with e-mails saying, "How dare you do this!"

What happens next?
It's going to be a battle, and if nobody in Congress is willing to stand up and say, "Keep your hands off of this, and we'll change the statute to make it clear," then I think grassroots Internet activity is in danger. The impact would affect e-mail lists, especially if there's any sense that they're done in coordination with the campaign. If I forward something from the campaign to my personal list of several hundred people, which is a great grassroots activity, that's what we're talking about having to look at.

Senators McCain and Feingold have argued that we have to regulate the Internet, that we have to regulate e-mail. They sued us in court over this and they won.

If Congress doesn't change the law, what kind of activities will the FEC have to target?
We're talking about any decision by an individual to put a link (to a political candidate) on their home page, set up a blog, send out mass e-mails, any kind of activity that can be done on the Internet.

Again, blogging could also get us into issues about online journals and non-online journals. Why should CNET get an exemption but not an informal blog? Why should Salon or Slate get an exemption? Should Nytimes.com and Opinionjournal.com get an exemption but not online sites, just because the newspapers have a print edition as well?

Why wouldn't the news exemption cover bloggers and online media?
Because the statute refers to periodicals or broadcast, and it's not clear the Internet is either of those. Second, because there's no standard for being a blogger, anyone can claim to be one, and we're back to the deregulated Internet that the judge objected to. Also I think some of my colleagues on the commission would be uncomfortable with that kind of blanket exemption.

So if you're using text that the campaign sends you, and you're reproducing it on your blog or forwarding it to a mailing list, you could be in trouble?
Yes. In fact, the regulations are very specific that reproducing a campaign's material is a reproduction for purpose of triggering the law. That'll count as an expenditure that counts against campaign finance law.

This is an incredible thicket. If someone else doesn't take action, for instance in Congress, we're running a real possibility of serious Internet regulation. It's going to be bizarre.

Source: CNET News
COMMENTS:
andrewgray - [profile] Sun Oct 7th 19:29 2012 / #1
If you chose to lease your own web space, you will be able to design it as you like. Now, you need to find a blogging software to use on your site. These are easy to use, with two popular programs being WordPress and Blogger. how to make money with a blog
davidlaw - [profile] Fri Oct 4th 20:40 2013 / #2
I have discovered very useful information there, appreciate talking about this. please attempt to add more informative posts have the ability to stop us in touch. LONDON MASSAGE
tahirkhan - [profile] Thu Oct 10th 22:16 2013 / #3
A much more sensible and permanent approach to natural weight loss is hidden in the efficacy of a Precor Elliptical Machine with Cross Trainer. Learn more Crosstrainer Training
tahirkhan - [profile] Thu Oct 10th 22:16 2013 / #4
wwwypunto provides one of the computers and laptops catalogs cheaper second hand with the latest features and optimal conditions.We have partnered with major computer stores both in Madrid, Coruña, Sevilla Sabadell and to offer a fast, guaranteed and greater variety. Visit http://www.wwwypunto.com
davidlaw - [profile] Tue Oct 15th 17:12 2013 / #5
Pure Green Coffee Bean Extract is proved to be a very effective weight loss supplement that you can avail in the market today. This weight loss supplement has very positive health benefits and it is proven to prevent the deposit of fat within the body. Visit green coffee bean
davidlaw - [profile] Tue Oct 15th 17:12 2013 / #6
You are beautiful! Don't let anything or anyone make you feel any less. Garcinia Cambogia is being used as a health supplement. It helps block unwanted fat, suppress appetite, and fight against stress. pure garcinia cambogia
davidlaw - [profile] Tue Oct 15th 17:12 2013 / #7
What a great article. I would also like to mention banff hotels are the best in the area around Canada. They have are situated in a beautiful rocky mountain with natural springs. You can find very reasonable banff accommodation right near the banff national park. Visit there and you will be amazed at the natural beauty.
Anonymous posts are no longer allowed on Prague TV.
Please login or register to post to Prague TV.

Read about the change...

Registering is easy. Simply choose a username and password, hit submit, and you are ready to go.

Register now for full access...
Cybex: Click to sign up for a free trial PTV Partner Ad: Cybex
Come try our spa services.Learn more...

RECENT GOLD LISTINGS

Gold NinjaGold Ninja

The Swan Divadelní...The Swan Divadelní...
Prague's Theater Club

Theatre RoyalTheatre Royal
multipurpose cultural venue in t...

The Best Accommodation in Prague


V6 Technology; Projects; Management

DID YOU KNOW...

There are more mobile phones in the Czech Republic than the number of people - CZ has 12.749 million mobile subscribers or a 123.2% penetration rate. (September 2007)

See a bug? Want
to request a feature?

Send feedbackFeedback Form

Prague TV Home | Contact | About | FAQ | Site Map | Search | Advertise | Privacy | Terms of Service | Google+

Prague TV is a Real Time Production. ©2014 All rights reserved.

Prague Directory