Selling your house as a part of a divorce in the Czech Republic

Legal advice provided in cooperation with our partner rutland ježek

During the time of a marriage, the spouses are purchasing all assets, including the real estate, into the common property of the spouses, unless the spouses have agreed, in the form of the notarial deed, to different regime of the ownership (e.g. a prenuptial agreement); or unless the assets were bought from the monies earned by any of the spouses prior the marriage or the assets were part of a donation or an inheritance to any of the spouses.

Once it comes to a divorce of the spouses, the common property has to be divided. In the following article, we briefly describe the legal regime concerning the division of the assets in the common property of the spouses focusing on the real estate located in the Czech Republic.

Legal frame

According to Czech legislation, in particular the Civil Code, there are three options for how the common property of the spouses can be divided. In particular, the common property shall be divided (i) as a part of the divorce proceedings on the basis of a written agreement on division of the common property of spouses, confirmed by the respective court, OR (ii) after the divorce on the basis of a separate written agreement of the spouses, OR (iii) as a part of a separate court proceedings instigated by any of the spouses during the first three years as of their divorce, provided that the common property was not divided under the divorce proceedings.

In case that the common property is not divided under the letters (i) to (iii) above, then pursuant to the respective provisions of the Civil Code the irrefutable legal assumption of joint ownership of the spouses of the real estate previously forming the common property automatically applies.

The division of the common property on the basis of an agreement

During the divorce proceedings, the spouses may conclude an agreement on the division of the common property including the division of the real estate. Such an agreement can be presented to and proved by the divorce court in the process of the consensual divorce. In case that the consensual divorce cannot be reached, the divorce court shall rule on the divorce of the spouses itself and shall leave the division of the common property to be dealt with by the ex-spouses separately.

In any case, the agreement on division or the real estate being part of the common property of spouses has to be in writing with verified signatures of both spouses. Such agreement shall determine in detail who shall be the owner of respective properties forming the common property. The spouses are not limited in any way with regard to the disposal of the ownership; i.e. it may be agreed that one of the spouses shall become the sole owner of all the real estate which form the common property of the spouses. It may be agreed that one of the spouses shall become the owner of the real estate, whereas the other spouse shall have the right to use it, under agreed terms.

Also, in times when the real estate market is up, the spouses may agree to sell the real estate and to divide the revenues. Despite of the fact that the spouses are free to dispose the real estate in any agreed manner, their agreement has to always respect the rights of third parties (e.g. individual creditors, mortgage banks); in case that any rights of such third parties are infringed, then such third party is entitled to raise a claim with the respective court to decide that the agreement is not effective towards itself.

The division of the common property on the basis of a court´s decision

Should the spouses fail to reach a mutual agreement on division of their common property then any of the former spouses is entitled file a court action seeking the division of the common property on the basis of the court decision. When considering the matter, the court shall be deciding only about the common property specified in the plaintiff’s application, whereas the manner of the property division is up to the court's consideration. Nevertheless, the aim of the court is to rationally divide the common property using an approach similar to that adopted when dividing co-ownership. As to dividing the real estate, the court may decide in the following manner.

The real estate may be (i) allotted to one of the former spouses or (ii) allotted into a co-ownership of the real estate by the former spouses. The court may also order the real estate to be sold at a public auction, with the shares on the revenue being allocated to each of the former spouses. The court may also divide the real estate into housing units and/or to grant an easement or other form of non-financial servitude to one or both of the former spouses.

The value of the real estate property and shares allocated to each of the former spouses will be determined on the day of the court's decision. When the property is to be divided by a decision of the court, the disparity of spousal shares is very rare. However, when pursuing the equity in the matter the court may rule on the disparity of the shares (e.g. in cases when one of the spouses made repairs or made improvement to the real estate from his/her own funds rather than using funds belonging to the common property). In this case, such “active” former spouse shall be therefore awarded a bigger share.

The division of the common property on the basis of the legal assumption

In case that during the first three years after the divorce the spouses are neither able to agree on division of the common property, nor any of the spouses files an action to court to decide on such division, an irrefutable legal assumption of joint ownership applies. Under this legal assumption, the former spouses become joint-owners of the real estate which was forming their common property. Each of the former spouses owns id. one half of such real estate.

To conclude, the division of real estate is mostly divided upon mutual agreement between the spouses, which is strongly recommended since the costs of any starting and pending disputes are very costly and in most cases ineffective.


About rutland ježek:
The rutland ježek law firm in Prague focuses mainly on business law, real estate law, litigation, finance and banking law; the firm is ready to provide adequate comprehensive consulting thus offering an alternative for clients of international law firms. The international dimension of the provided services is guaranteed by its track record and cooperation with leading law firms in most European countries, the USA and other jurisdictions. Czech lawyers of the rutland ježek team have long experience in providing legal consulting to transnational corporations, large Czech companies as well as medium size firms and individuals, acquired in leading international law and tax firms. More on www.rutlandjezek.com.

We provide legal consultations to the SVJ representatives or neighbors who are disturbed by the Airbnb service run in the building as well as to unit owners whose SVJ does not act in the case of disputes amongst the unit owners. We are able to provide consultancy and take legal action on any other issue which can arise in connection with Airbnb.

Related articles

Facebook comments

Cafe 80's

Feel the rhythm and party to the biggest hits of the 80’s!

Bee Handy - Prague Handyman

Looking for a Handyman in Prague?

Antik Bílá Hora

New shop open from Monday, March 27 - Dive with us into...

Toboga Prague

Kids Indoor Playground in Prague 5, OC Zlicin

Baby in Style

Kids fashion shop

Dum U Velke Boty

A small family hotel in an old renaissance-looking burgher...

MoneyGram

Send cash around the world in minutes with no bank account...

Antik Bílá Hora

Antiques, collectibles and more ...

PragueMonitor.com

Prague’s # 1 source for Czech news in English…

PragueConnect.cz

Expat and Czech Business Professional Network

ManSprichtDeutsch.cz

Deutschsprachiges Informationsportal